20050419, 23:07  #78 
Aug 2004
Melbourne, Australia
2^{3}×19 Posts 
Yay!
Fantastic find! They're all primes too. Three new largest octoproths.

20050420, 01:31  #79 
Aug 2004
Melbourne, Australia
98_{16} Posts 
Found the most wanted
Yay!
1689898522725 72 1704984216915 72 1729280652225 72 1993468873725 72 The new most wanted is now n=74 (425575968195/18889465931478580854784 searched) Oh and I (finally) completed n=42. 
20050420, 01:33  #80 
Aug 2004
Melbourne, Australia
2^{3}×19 Posts 
Compression
Because there were too many octo's with small bases I've zipped up the complete list of octo's for bases n<=42.

20050420, 01:46  #81 
2^{2}·7·83 Posts 
Octo RMA 1.74 delay
I've been sick lately, and have not made much progress with octo code, but I know now, exactly how it will be integrated.
Great work 15k'ers! TTn 
20050420, 07:05  #82  
"Sander"
Oct 2002
52.345322,5.52471
29·41 Posts 
Quote:


20050420, 14:37  #83 
Aug 2004
Melbourne, Australia
2^{3}×19 Posts 
New most wanted n=87
I've been trying to find the smallest octos for each base. Lots of success... however n=87 is a stubborn base. Sieved upto 4*10^12, and no success.
Bedtime now. 
20050420, 14:48  #84  
"Sander"
Oct 2002
52.345322,5.52471
1189_{10} Posts 
Quote:
FYI, i searched n=142 to 3.09x10^13 

20050420, 15:15  #85  
Nov 2003
1110100100100_{2} Posts 
Quote:
May I ask: With so many other established computational projects already available, why do this one? I accuse noone. However, I suspect that the answer is: "Because this project is new, it is relatively easy to get results". Let me quote John Kennedy: "We choose to go to the moon and do the other thing... Not because they are easy, but because they are hard." There is little reward in using other people's software to do easy computations. Rewards come from succeeding at something that is hard. The satisfaction one derives from solving a problem is commensurate with the level of effort. 

20050420, 15:45  #86  
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
10101100010110_{2} Posts 
Quote:
Sometimes relatively easy tasks are best attempted by people with relatively lowly resources. They free up the people with massive resources from having to clear them up for completeness sake. That is why I am factoring 6,768L.c130 personally rather than using the grossly disproportionate resources of NFSNET. I leave open completely the question of whether everyone has the same value function. Paul 

20050420, 15:51  #87 
Jun 2003
5,197 Posts 
n = 44 complete
I am doing n=45 now.

20050420, 16:02  #88  
Banned
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia
2·2,417 Posts 
Quote:
Luigi 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Small Primes for Octoproths <= 155  ValerieVonck  Octoproth Search  100  20070216 23:43 
Found Octoproths  Range Archive  ValerieVonck  Octoproth Search  0  20070214 07:24 
Number of octoproths per n  Greenbank  Octoproth Search  15  20060120 16:29 
Need help with NewPGen(octoproths)  jasong  Software  1  20050510 20:08 